Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2001-04-28 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2001-04-28 House Journal Page 1324 SB 103 The following was again before the House with Amendment No. 1 moved and pending: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 103(2d RLS) "An Act relating to election campaigns and legislative ethics." Representative Halcro moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. New Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Halcro: Page 9, line 26: Delete "reasonable" Insert "incidental" 2001-04-28 House Journal Page 1325 Page 9, line 27: Delete "or legislative employee" Page 9, line 28 - 29: Delete "or legislative employee" Representative Halcro moved and asked unanimous consent that New Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that the question be divided. The Speaker ruled the question was divisible. There being no objection, New Amendment No. 1 was divided. New Amendment No. 1 - Part A: Page 9, line 26: Delete "reasonable" Insert "incidental" Representative Berkowitz placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall New Amendment No. 1 - Part A be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 103(2d RLS) Second Reading New Amendment No. 1 - Part A YEAS: 22 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Bunde, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Murkowski, Stevens 2001-04-28 House Journal Page 1326 Nays: Chenault, Coghill, Fate, Foster, James, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Mulder, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Kookesh And so, New Amendment No. 1 - Part A was adopted. New Amendment No. 1 - Part B: Page 9, line 27: Delete "or legislative employee" Page 9, line 28 - 29: Delete "or legislative employee" The question being: "Shall New Amendment No. 1 - Part B be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 103(2d RLS) am H Second Reading New Amendment No. 1 - Part B YEAS: 11 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Guess, Halcro, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Meyer, Murkowski Nays: Bunde, Chenault, Coghill, Davies, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Kookesh And so, New Amendment No. 1 - Part B was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative James: Page 2, lines 8 through 11, following "section.": Delete all material. 2001-04-28 House Journal Page 1327 Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Davies objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 103(2d RLS) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 29 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Coghill, James, Masek, Meyer, Moses, Porter, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Fate, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, McGuire, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Kookesh Absent: Bunde, Foster, Lancaster And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 103(2d RLS) am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. Representative Berkowitz objected. The Speaker stated that HCS CSSB 103(2d RLS) am H will advance to third reading on the April 29, 2001, calendar.